Sound quality perception of loudspeakers evaluated by different sensory descriptive methods and preference mapping
Publication details
Journal : Journal of sensory studies , p. 15 , 2020
International Standard Numbers
:
Printed
:
0887-8250
Electronic
:
1745-459X
Publication type : Academic article
Links
:
DOI
:
doi.org/10.1111/joss.12620
Research areas
Sensory sciences
If you have questions about the publication, you may contact Nofima’s Chief Librarian.
Kjetil Aune
Chief Librarian
kjetil.aune@nofima.no
Summary
Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) was compared with novel sensory methodology on five high‐end loudspeakers using five tracks. The focus of the study was on the ability of different sensory methods to predict quality assessments (liking) made by consumers. Preference mapping indicates that projective mapping (PM) and Check‐All‐That‐Apply (CATA) when performed with experts can provide results comparable to QDA, although slightly less accurate. PM done by consumers is less comparable to QDA. Combinations of the sensory tests were also attempted without any clear improvement of results.
