Skip to main content

Published 2009

Read in Norwegian

Publication details

Journal : Genetics Selection Evolution , vol. 41 , p. 10 , 2009

International Standard Numbers :
Printed : 0999-193X
Electronic : 1297-9686

Publication type : Academic article

Contributors : Ødegård, Jørgen; Sonesson, Anna Kristina; Yazdi, Hossein; Meuwissen, Theodorus

If you have questions about the publication, you may contact Nofima’s Chief Librarian.

Kjetil Aune
Chief Librarian
kjetil.aune@nofima.no

Summary

Conclusion: Substantial differences between introgression programs using classical and genomic selection were observed, and the former was generally inferior with respect to both genetic gain and the ability to preserve the target QTL. Combining genomic selection with gene-assisted selection for the target QTL acted as an extra precaution against loss of the target QTL and gave additional genetic gain for disease resistance. However, the effect on total merit index was limited.

Contacts: