Published 2004

Read in Norwegian

Publication details

Journal : Journal of Chemometrics , vol. 18 , p. 422–429–8 , 2004

International Standard Numbers :
Printed : 0886-9383
Electronic : 1099-128X

Publication type : Academic article

Contributors : Mevik, Bjørn-Helge; Cederkvist, Henrik René

If you have questions about the publication, you may contact Nofima’s Chief Librarian.

Kjetil Aune
Chief Librarian


This paper presents results from simulations based on real data, comparing several competing mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimators on principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR): leave-one-out cross-validation, K-fold and adjusted K-fold crossvalidation, the ordinary bootstrap estimate, the bootstrap smoothed cross-validation (BCV) estimate and the 0.632 bootstrap estimate. The overall performance of the estimators is compared in terms of their bias, variance and squared error. The results indicate that the 0.632 estimate and leave-one-out cross-validation are preferable when one can afford the computation. Otherwise adjusted 5- or 10-fold cross-validation are good candidates because of theircomputational efficiency.