Published 2000

Read in Norwegian

Publication details

Journal : Aquaculture Nutrition , vol. 6 , p. 103–108 , 2000

Publisher : Blackwell Publishing

International Standard Numbers :
Printed : 1353-5773
Electronic : 1365-2095

Publication type : Academic article

Contributors : Storebakken, Trond; Shearer, Karl Douglas; Roem, Andries J.

Issue : 2

If you have questions about the publication, you may contact Nofima’s Chief Librarian.

Kjetil Aune
Chief Librarian


An experiment with 0.2-kg Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar in saltwater was conducted to determine if the fish could grow normally, and maintain normal nitrogen (N) and mineral balance when fed a diet with the majority of the protein (75%) derived from soy-protein concentrate (SPC). The two diets contained 50% SPC and 15% fish meal (FM) or 60% FM as the sources of protein. No calcium phosphate was added to the diets in order to assess the availability of P from the ingredients. A second aim was to investigate if whole-body concentrations of essential elements and growth were related in individual salmon. Growth (SGR=0.88-0.89) was similar in salmon fed the two diets, and the fish nearly doubled their body weights during the 84 days of feeding. Feed conversion was more efficient for the FM diet (0.81 kg intake kg(-1) gain) than for the SPC diet (0.89 kg kg(-1)). The intake of N was similar, faecal loss of N was lower, while the metabolic N excretion was greater in the fish fed the FM than the SPC diet. This resulted in a total excretion of 35.4 g N kg(-1) gain for the salmon fed the FM diet and 35.5 g N for the fish fed the SPC diet. Both the intake, faecal and metabolic excretion of P were higher in the fish fed the FM diet than the SPC diet, resulting in a total excretion of 10.5 g P kg(-1) gain for the FM diet and 7.2 g P for the SPC diet. Whole-body concentrations of Ca, Mg, P and Zn were lower in the fish fed the SPC diet, while the Ca-P ratio was decreased, both when compared with the fish at the start of the experiment, and the fish fed the FM diet. The differences in elemental composition were ascribed to a combination of reduced availability of elements due to phytic acid and lower concentration of elements in the SPC than in the FM. No reduction in growth of individual fish, which could be ascribed to reduced availability of essential elements, was seen.