Published 2008

Read in Norwegian

Publication details

Journal : Journal of Molecular Modeling , vol. 14 , p. 777–788 , 2008

Publisher : Springer

International Standard Numbers :
Printed : 1610-2940
Electronic : 0948-5023

Publication type : Academic article

Contributors : Kyomuhendo, Peter; Nilsen, Inge Waller; Brandsdal, Bjørn Olav; Smalås, Arne O.

If you have questions about the publication, you may contact Nofima’s Chief Librarian.

Kjetil Aune
Chief Librarian
kjetil.aune@nofima.no

Summary

It is known that bacteria contain inhibitors of lysozyme activity. The recently discovered Escherichia coli inhibitor of vertebrate lysozyme (Ivy) and its potential interactions with several goose-type (g-type) lysozymes from fish were studied using functional enzyme assays, comparative homology modelling, protein–protein docking, and molecular dynamics simulations. Enzyme assays carried out on salmon g-type lysozyme revealed a lack of inhibition by Ivy. Detailed analysis of the complexes formed between Ivy and both hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) and goose egg white lysozyme (GEWL) suggests that electrostatic interactions make a dominant contribution to inhibition. Comparison of three dimensional models of aquatic g-type lysozymes revealed important insertions in the β domain, and specific sequence substitutions yielding altered electrostatic surface properties and surface curvature at the protein–protein interface. Thus, based on structural homology models, we propose that Ivy is not effective against any of the known fish g-type lysozymes. Docking studies suggest a weaker binding mode between Ivy and GEWL compared to that with HEWL, and our models explain the mechanistic necessity for conservation of a set of residues in g-type lysozymes as a prerequisite for inhibition by Ivy